ME Bank's Household Financial Comfort Report has unearthed some surprising results in the middle of tumultous times.
In a surprise twist, the flood of government stimulus combined with financial actions of households in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has pushed the nation’s household financial comfort to a near record high, according to the latest report from ME Bank.
The question has to be asked, however, what will happen if government support is tapered too much and too soon?
These are the key findings of ME Bank’s Household Financial Comfort Report, a bi-annual survey which quantifies how comfortable Australian households feel about their financial situation.
At a Glance:
ME’s 18th survey showed Australian household financial comfort increased 3 per cent to 5.76 (out of 10) in the past six months to June 2020 − just shy of its historical high of 5.78 recorded in December 2014.
Contrary to expectations, financial comfort has jumped the most among typically struggling cohorts – such as casual workers, the unemployed, low income households and single parent households (though their comfort levels remain a great deal lower than the average household and higher-income Australians).
Almost all 11 measures that make up the Household Financial Comfort Index improved, notably ‘comfort with the ability to cope with a financial emergency’ (up 9 per cent to 5.25, the best level on record) and ‘cash savings’ (up 8 per cent to 5.48).
ME Bank’s Consulting Economist, Jeff Oughton, attributed the high financial comfort to a combination of prudent financial actions by households in response to the both the health and economic crisis, and unprecedented government support.
“Fear of COVID-19 and a very weak labour market triggered many households to increase precautionary savings, reduce spending, draw on long-term savings, such as superannuation, and delay bills or loan repayments,” said Mr Oughton.
“In June, 57 per cent of households ‘spent less than they earned each month’ – up 8 percentage points to the highest level of households saving since the survey began nine years ago.
"However, paradoxically, this cautious behaviour and a lack of spending may cause a negative knock-on effect to the economy and a deeper recession.
“Government stimulus has bought some time and helped boost the financial resilience of Australian households for now.
"But a household savings cliff remains as government support tapers.
"Unless the economy gains momentum, tapering government support too soon could have disastrous consequences on the financial comfort of households.”
Savings cliff and high underemployment point to households still on the brink in June, only 32 per cent of households indicated they could ‘maintain their lifestyle for more than three months if they lost their income’.
Many households were already under pressure before COVID-19, particularly with low household income growth and cost of living concerns.
Around 21per cent of households have less than $1,000 in savings (on average, about $300 – significantly lower than the current JobSeeker fortnightly payment).
Of these households, only 3 per cent reported they could maintain their current lifestyle for more than six months if they lost their incomes, and only 7 per cent for more than three
months (or when JobSeeker payments begin to taper).
A record number of workers reported that it would be ‘difficult to find a new job in two months if they become unemployed’ − up 10 points to a new survey record of 59 per cent.
Notably almost 30 per cent indicated it would be ‘very difficult’.
Furthermore, the proportion of part-time or casual workers seeking more hours jumped to 39 per cent, compared to 27 per cent six months ago.
On average, these workers would like an extra 18 hours per week, compared to 17 in December 2019.
“Financial comfort levels are up for now, but many households are on the cliff’s edge," said Mr Oughton.
"They’ve lost income, their jobs and entire livelihoods, their wafer-thin savings buffer is dwindling, and government support is the main action stopping them from falling over.
“This survey shows that the financial consequences for households of this pandemic remain critical.
Many eyes will be on what governments do in the final months of 2020 and into next year.”
Prior to government income payments and other available assistance and their own financial actions, around 34 per cent of households reported to be ‘worse off’ from the pandemic, compared to 20 per cent ‘better off’, while 46 per cent reported ‘the same’ comfort despite the pandemic.
More Victorians reported to be ‘a lot worse off’ (11 per cent) - the highest of any state or territory and fewer ‘a lot better off’ (5 per cent) than other states.
Households were also asked the main reasons for a worsening or improved financial situation.
Households experiencing a ‘worsening financial situation’ cited ‘changes to employment arrangements and job security’ (33 per cent), ‘changes to income’ (24 per cent), and for the first time, ‘the impact of COVID-19’ (24 per cent).
However, 8 per cent of households specified ‘support from government’ as a reason for an improved financial situation, compared to only 1 percent in December 2019.
Households were also asked what assistance and actions they adopted in response to the pandemic.
Almost 40 per cent of households have benefited from at least one or more of these major government payments and other assistance and/or taken their own financial actions in response to the pandemic.
By June:
Key winners and losers in ME’s 18th Household Financial Comfort Report:
Winners:
Losers:
The full copy of ME’s 18th Household Financial Comfort Report can be found here.
Similar to this:
Household financial comfort slides across regional Australia